# Can we have few validation examples of weekly data?

**URL:** <https://forum.numer.ai/t/can-we-have-few-validation-examples-of-weekly-data/3553>\
**Category:** Data Science\
**Created:** [June 7, 2021, 2:11am UTC](https://forum.numer.ai/t/can-we-have-few-validation-examples-of-weekly-data/3553 "2021-06-07T02:11:52Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![avishfrnds](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/8baadc/32.png) [@avishfrnds](https://forum.numer.ai/u/avishfrnds)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2021, 2:11am UTC](https://forum.numer.ai/t/can-we-have-few-validation-examples-of-weekly-data/3553/1 "2021-06-07T02:11:53Z")

</div>

Since model has to ultimately run on weekly data, would it make sense to also include a set of weekly data in validation set?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wigglemuse](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex009/user_avatar/forum.numer.ai/wigglemuse/32/3094_2.png) [@wigglemuse](https://forum.numer.ai/u/wigglemuse)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2021, 3:24am UTC](https://forum.numer.ai/t/can-we-have-few-validation-examples-of-weekly-data/3553/2 "2021-06-07T03:24:37Z")

</div>

It does not run on “weekly data” in the sense that it only lasts one week. It is monthly data still, just overlapping with a new round starting each week (but each round still lasts 4 weeks).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![autratec](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/6bbea6/32.png) [@autratec](https://forum.numer.ai/u/autratec)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2021, 11:27am UTC](https://forum.numer.ai/t/can-we-have-few-validation-examples-of-weekly-data/3553/3 "2021-06-13T11:27:35Z")

</div>

Agrew that we should reduce the data in tournament data set. 2.5G data is too big for newbie.
