# Can You Beat Random Numbers?

**URL:** <https://forum.numer.ai/t/can-you-beat-random-numbers/4022>\
**Category:** Signals\
**Created:** [September 1, 2021, 9:55am UTC](https://forum.numer.ai/t/can-you-beat-random-numbers/4022 "2021-09-01T09:55:15Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 17

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![of\_s](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex009/user_avatar/forum.numer.ai/of_s/32/2627_2.png) [@of\_s](https://forum.numer.ai/u/of_s)\
**Post date:** [April 1, 2022, 4:01pm UTC](https://forum.numer.ai/t/can-you-beat-random-numbers/4022/17 "2022-04-01T16:01:54Z")

</div>

The real question is: **Can you beat all 0.99’s**?

I was running this experiment from the observations in these two prior posts I shared:

- [Possible p / (1-p) vulnerability in Signals](http://forum.numer.ai/t/possible-p-1-p-vulnerability-in-signals/4314)
- [Is TB200 neutralizing the Moore-Penrose Inversion neutralization step in Signals](http://forum.numer.ai/t/is-tb200-neutralizing-the-moore-penrose-inversion-neutralization-step-in-signals/4308)

All 0.99 submissions: [https://signals.numer.ai/of\_s\_3](https://signals.numer.ai/of_s_3)  
All 0.01 submissions: [https://signals.numer.ai/of\_s\_4](https://signals.numer.ai/of_s_4)

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.numer.ai/t/can-you-beat-random-numbers/4022)._