# Feature request/bug report: Calculate leaderboard returns considering the payout factor **URL:** \ **Category:** Feedback\ **Created:** [May 16, 2021, 10:51am UTC](https://forum.numer.ai/t/feature-request-bug-report-calculate-leaderboard-returns-considering-the-payout-factor/3317 "2021-05-16T10:51:16Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 2
**Author:** ![ranzhang](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/8797f3/32.png) [@ranzhang](https://forum.numer.ai/u/ranzhang)\ **Post date:** [March 28, 2024, 2:24am UTC](https://forum.numer.ai/t/feature-request-bug-report-calculate-leaderboard-returns-considering-the-payout-factor/3317/2 "2024-03-28T02:24:17Z")
> [@Notebook to visualize historic model performance and see effect of different MMC multipliers and payout factors](http://forum.numer.ai/t/notebook-to-visualize-historic-model-performance-and-see-effect-of-different-mmc-multipliers-and-payout-factors/3316/1): > > Interestingly I noticed it looks like the 3 month and 1 year return on the leaderboard are not taking into consideration the roundPayoutFactor. I realized this as round 263 was my first round of seeing my 3 month returns on the leaderboard, and round 251 was my first staked round. But my 3 month return for ml\_is\_lyf on the leaderboard is 99.2%, and my performance for round 263 calculated above is 1.934420, which is a 93.4420% return. But you’ll notice if I set all the roundPayoutFactor to 1 (as if there was no payout factor) as I do below, then my calculated return is the same as on the leaderboard, with a performance of 1.991507, which is a 99.1507% 3-month return. I’ll make a separate feedback post about this issue. yes! It’s quite strange --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.numer.ai/t/feature-request-bug-report-calculate-leaderboard-returns-considering-the-payout-factor/3317)._